Some thoughts on the regnant follies
Will I be depressed or elated after election day? Depends on whether my eyes and heart are stayed on His kingdom or this world. I’m also concerned about the way I hear people on both sides of this discussion mischaracterize the views of the other by creating "straw men" that really do not represent the other candidate’s position and then readily demolish views that no one actually holds. Frankly, the way Christians have tried to work through politics as a way to accomplish biblical ends has led to mixed results practically. In terms of public opinion, the result has been disastrous. While I’m not always sure how polls succeed in capturing public opinion, unChristian reports that “a fifth of all Americans believe ‘the political efforts of conservative Christians’ are a major problem facing the country today. Half of the adult population describe the political involvement of Christians as a concern. More than 110 million adult Americans admit they maintain misgivings about the role of ‘conservative Christians’ in politics.”
I had threatened to blog on this issue, but believe Phil’s message is simply the best corrective I’ve found. You may download it here: http://www.thegracelifepulpit.com/audio/GL-2008-03-06-PJ.mp3.
Make no mistake, I've listened to much about what each candidate has said and considered their views across a wide spectrum of their positions, and have made up my mind and will, as always, vote. Nevertheless, what Daniel says about the Lord is true:
He changes times and seasons; he removes kings and sets up kings; he gives wisdom to the wise and knowledge to those who have understanding; he reveals deep and hidden things; he knows what is in the darkness, and the light dwells with him. Daniel 2:21-22 (ESV)
2 Comments:
Curious where "regnant follies" came from. Just read in Doug Wilsons Father Hunger but not sure the significance or history?
Dear Erik,
I had completely forgotten this post. As you read, I first saw it in Credenda Agenda ages ago (I mean 15 or 20 years ago) and loved the phrase. SO, I have no idea who is responsible, but happily have been glad to abscond the phrase and run off with it. I think it captures the feel of a philosophy which temporarily seems to have reached undeniable and unassailable rule in the culture, but which will end up on the ash heap of this world. You know, "being on the right side of history," as people say who have grown tired of giving a thoughtful response to someone who doesn't agree with them. So, I've not seen the previous use, though it sounds like something T.S. Eliot would write. I'll let you know if I find out . . .
His and yours,
Steve
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home